<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The VMguy &#187; Disaster Recovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/category/tipsandtricks/tatdr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Virtualization for the little guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Release: vCenter Infrastructure Navigator 1.0</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1807</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1807#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infrastructor Navigator has been released and can be found here.  Rather than go thru the details, I&#8217;ll repost the features from the release notes: VMware vCenter™ Infrastructure Navigator is an application awareness plug-in to vCenter Server, and provides continuous dependency mapping of applications. Infrastructure Navigator offers application context to the virtual infrastructure administrators to monitor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Infrastructor Navigator has been released and can be found <a href="http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/infrastructure_operations_management/vmware_vcenter_infrastructure_navigator/1_0" target="_blank">here</a>.  Rather than go thru the details, I&#8217;ll repost the features from the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/adm/doc/vcenter-infrastructure-navigator-10-release-notes.html" target="_blank">release notes</a>:</p>
<p>VMware vCenter™ Infrastructure Navigator is an application awareness plug-in to vCenter Server, and provides continuous dependency mapping of applications. Infrastructure Navigator offers application context to the virtual infrastructure administrators to monitor and manage the virtual infrastructure inventory objects and actions. Administrators can use Infrastructure Navigator to understand the impact of the change on the virtual environment in their application infrastructure. Infrastructure Navigator helps virtual infrastructure administrators perform the following tasks:</p>
<ul>
<li>Make accurate first-level triage to help either eliminate the problem or associate the problem with the virtual infrastructure when business service users report problems.</li>
<li>Assess change impact, manage, and communicate virtual infrastructure issues for critical applications.</li>
<li>Understand the application and business impact of changes to the virtual infrastructure on applications.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Open Source Licenses (OSL) file for the virtual appliance is available at <tt>/root/open_source_licenses.txt</tt>. You can retrieve the file by running the <code>scp root@&lt;appliance IP&gt;:open_source_licenses.txt</code> command.</p>
<p>Infrastructure Navigator is supported on vCenter Server 5.0 with the vSphere Web Client. The supported ESX versions include ESX/ESXi 3.5 (build 425420), ESX/ESXi 4.0 (build 398348), ESX/ESXi 4.1 (build 433742), and all builds of ESXi 5.x.</p>
<h2><a name="key"></a>Features</h2>
<p>This section describes the key features for the Infrastructure Navigator 1.0.0 release.</p>
<p><strong>Simplifies and automates the deployment and the discovery process and keeps manages Application Component Knowledge Base (KB) current</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Eliminates physical switch spanning or credential based discovery.</li>
<li>Discovers and maps the application components and dependencies using KBs and presents this knowledge through maps or search for relevant use cases.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Provide Infrastructure Navigator data for vCenter Server and related solutions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ensures that the application and dependency data is available to the rest of the vCenter Server entities and its various solutions through the vCenter extensibility APIs.</li>
<li>Supports SRM integration to set up more focused and accurate site recovery and backup plans.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1807';
  addthis_title  = 'Release%3A+vCenter+Infrastructure+Navigator+1.0';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1807/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throttle vSphere Replication with Network I/O Control</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1792</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1792#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vSphere Replication and Site Recovery Manager make it very easy to replicate your VMs to your DR site (ahem, once they are set up).  Some customers asked me if there is any way to throttle the bandwidth used for replication.  The good news is that there is a way in vMware software but it cannot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vSphere Replication and Site Recovery Manager make it very easy to replicate your VMs to your DR site (ahem, once they are set up).  Some customers asked me if there is any way to throttle the bandwidth used for replication.  The good news is that there is a way in vMware software but it cannot be found in SRM.  Unfortunately, it can only be found in the Enterprise Plus Edition of vSphere 5.  It&#8217;s Network I/O Control in the Distributed vSwitch (DvS) in v5.  I&#8217;m not going to go into a deep dive on Network I/O Control but I will recommend that you read the Network I/O Control best practices doc <a href="http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/techpaper/VMW_Netioc_BestPractices.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>To enable Network I/O Control we need to have a DvS in place.  If we select the distributed switch and then select the Resource Application tab on the right, this gives us the &#8220;properties&#8221; option on the far right.  By selecting the Properties option, you can enable Network I/O Control on the DvS.  Once enabled you can see all of the System network resource pools.  There is one at the bottom of the list labeled &#8220;vSphere Replication (VR) Traffic&#8221;.  Selecting it and then clicking the &#8220;Edit Settings&#8221; link just below it opens up the settings window.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1795" title="Screen Shot 2011-12-08 at 11.13.00 PM" src="http://www.vmguy.com/uploads/Screen-Shot-2011-12-08-at-11.13.00-PM-240x300.png" alt="" width="240" height="300" /></p>
<p>From here, you can edit the adapter shares.  The shares are to balance the bandwidth so that network flows can use the bandwidth thats available from a given dvuplink.  The shares are for a given dvUplink.</p>
<p>Alternatively, you can uncheck the Unlimited checkbox and set a host limit.  Keep in mind that this is Megabits per sec, not MegaBytes.  This is also the limit of the combined set of dvUplinks on a given host.</p>
<p>Lastly, a QOS priority tag can be used.  The traffic will have a 802.1p tag applied to it.  The IEEE does not standardize or mandate the use of the priority tag applied to the packets but the switches should treat higher tags with higher priority.  The choices are None, 1-7.</p>
<p>While not the granular controls that we may wish for, say individual bandwidth controls on a per VM or per-site replication limits, these settings and options are a start.  Hopefully in the future in vSphere Replication v2 we will have more granular controls for bandwidth throttling but until then, these are what we can use.  Happy computing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1792';
  addthis_title  = 'Throttle+vSphere+Replication+with+Network+I%2FO+Control';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1792/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release: VMware Site Recovery Manager 5.0</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1744</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1744#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMWorld keeps rolling on and on.  VMware has made Site Recovery Manager 5.0 available for download here.  As I&#8217;ve mentioned time and time again, SRM is my favorite non-vSphere product from VMWare.  This one does not disappoint.  You can grab the download here.  Here&#8217;s the What&#8217;s New Section from the release notes: VMware vCenter Site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMWorld keeps rolling on and on.  VMware has made Site Recovery Manager 5.0 available for download <a href="http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/infrastructure_operations_management/vmware_vcenter_site_recovery_manager/5_0" target="_blank">here</a>.  As I&#8217;ve mentioned time and time again, SRM is my favorite non-vSphere product from VMWare.  This one does not disappoint.  You can grab the download here.  Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/srm/srm_releasenotes_5_0_0.html#whatsnew" target="_blank">What&#8217;s New Section</a> from <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/srm/srm_releasenotes_5_0_0.html" target="_blank">the release notes</a>:</p>
<p>VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager 5.0 enhances your ability to build, manage and execute reliable disaster recovery plans for your virtual environment. With the release of version 5.0, VMware has expanded the capabilities of Site Recovery Manager to provide unprecedented levels of protection. New use cases have been made possible through the addition of the following capabilities:</p>
<ul>
<li>vSphere Replication. When used in conjunction with VMware vSphere 5.0, Site Recovery Manager 5.0 introduces a new capability to utilize the vSphere 5.0 host to perform replication of powered-on virtual machines over the network to another vSphere 5.0 host, without the requirement for storage array-based replication. As virtual machines change with use, the changed blocks are replicated to a shadow copy of the virtual machine resident at the recovery site, in accordance with a Recovery Point Objective set as a property of the virtual machine itself.</li>
<li>Planned Migration. A new workflow designed to deliver migration while minimizing the risk of data loss. Planned migration will stop the workflow from continuing if an error is encountered, providing an opportunity to fix the problem, ensuring that systems are properly quiescent and that all data changes have been completely replicated.</li>
<li>Automated Re-Protection. Re-protection is a new extension to recovery plans for use only with array-based replication. Automated re-protect enables the environment at the recovery site to establish replication and protection of the environment back to the original protected site through a single click.</li>
<li>Automated Failback. Automated failback returns the entire environment to the originally protected primary site. This can only happen after re-protection has ensured that data replication and synchronization have been established to the original primary site. Failback will run the same workflow that was used to migrate the environment to the protected site, ensuring that the critical systems encapsulated by the recovery plan are returned to their original environment. Automated failback, like re-protection, is only available for use with array-based replication protected virtual machines.</li>
<li>Enhanced Dependency Definition. This includes the addition of more (5) priority groups, and the ability to set virtual machine dependencies within a priority group. Virtual machine dependencies can be defined to ensure that required systems are available before dependent virtual machines are powered on. This enables highly organized workflow control, ensuring that required services are available before dependent virtual machines are powered on.</li>
</ul>
<p><a name="i18n"></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1744';
  addthis_title  = 'Release%3A+VMware+Site+Recovery+Manager+5.0';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1744/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Recovery Manager 5: The BIG Feature List</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1704</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1704#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you probably know by now SRM5 is just over the horizon.  You have probably heard me mention numerous times how SRM has always been my favorite non-vSphere product from VMware.  Some great news is that they have made some great improvements in SRM5 and added the most-requested functionality.  Here we go: vSphere Replication &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably know by now SRM5 is just over the horizon.  You have probably heard me mention numerous times how SRM has always been my favorite non-vSphere product from VMware.  Some great news is that they have made some great improvements in SRM5 and added the most-requested functionality.  Here we go:</p>
<ul>
<li>vSphere Replication &#8211; The biggest feature add.  An      additional replication option which allows you to replicate your VMs      without having the storage perform the replication.  Even allows you      to replicate to/from local storage on the ESXi hosts.  There are some      important limits to vSphere Replication.  It&#8217;s not for      everything/everyone but it does do quite a bit for the first release.
<ul>
<li>Requires vSphere 5</li>
<li>Managed from the vSphere client       directly</li>
<li>ISOs and Floppys are not       replicated</li>
<li>Powered off/Suspended VMs are not       replicated</li>
<li>Non-critical files are not       replicated (swap files, dumps, logs, etc.)</li>
<li>VMs can have snapshots on the protected side but they       are automatically collapsed on the recovery side</li>
<li>Physical RDMs not supported (but       virtual RDMs are)</li>
<li>Fault Tolerant VMs, Linked Clones       and VM Templates are not supported</li>
<li>Automated Failback of vSphere       Replicated VMs is not supported in SRM 5.0</li>
<li>Requires VM Hardware version 7 or       8 (required for Change Block Tracking)</li>
<li>Supports up to 500 VMs</li>
<li>Asynchronous only</li>
<li>Minimum replication frequency is       every 15 minutes, max is every 24 hours</li>
<li>Initial copy can be seeded by       sneaker net (taking the initial on a portable HD and importing at the       destination, i.e. does not need to seed the initial copy over the wire)</li>
<li>File-level consistency (except       for planned migration &#8211; see below) quiesces OS file system before sending       changed blocks to the DR site (does not quiesce applications)</li>
<li>Included in both Standard and       Enterprise Editions of SRM</li>
<li>vSphere Replication is not available outside SRM5</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Scalability Improvements
<ul>
<li>1000 Total Protected VMs (Same as       SRM4.1)</li>
<li>500 Protected VMs in a single       protection group (same as SRM v4.1)</li>
<li>250 Protection Groups (Up from       150 in v4.1)</li>
<li>30 Simultaneous running recovery       plans (Up from 3 in v4.1 &#8211; this is the biggest improvement in scalability)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Planned      Migration &#8211; This is a big feature add.  This is another option when      you are going failover.  In 4.1 the only option was to start up the      VMs from the last good replication and go.  This option now allow you      to migrate when there is an <em>impending</em> disaster and the protected side is still up.  Planned      migration will shut down the VMs on the protected side then initiate a      replication of the storage frames (or vSphere Replication) to get the last      drop of changed data to the recovery side before powering on the VMs      and bringing them up.  One extremely important advantage to this      method: the VMs are always in a application-consistent state when they      come up in DR.  (Absolutely love this feature)</li>
<li>Failback &#8211; the      single most-requested feature in SRM4.  Once a failover occurs, the      admin clicks the “Reprotect” link to reset the recovery plan for      failback and reverse replication.  Once completed, the      recovery plan can be tested or run in the reverse direction and recovery the VMs to the origional protected site.  (This is outstanding for enterprises      that are required to do a true failover for DR testing.</li>
<li>User Interface      improvements – Slightly different look and feel.
<ul>
<li>both       sides are visible without vCenter linked mode</li>
<li>IP       changes for VMs during recovery can now be entered in the GUI (thank you VMware!)</li>
<li>Placeholder       VMs at the DR side now have a unique icon (with a thunderbolt thru it) to       identify them easily in the DR vCenter.</li>
<li>Reports       now include the user ID that initiated the Failover or DR test.</li>
<li>Reports       now include more information about the storage steps (including the       device friendly names)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>IPv6 Support – Ipv6 is now supported for all links.</li>
<li>IP Customization performance increase – big performance improvement      in the actual IP conversion in the VM</li>
<li>In guest callouts – now you can run a script inside the      VM, run a script on the SRM server or insert a breakpoint to post a      message (these also now have maximum timeouts as an option) during the recovery plans</li>
<li>New APIs on both the Protected and Recovery Sides – new      commands for 3<sup>rd</sup> party integration (note these are SOAP based      and not PowerShell or PowerCLI)</li>
<li>Dependency Improvements – There are now 5 priority      groups for each recovery plan.  Each      priority group has to finish completely before the recovery plan will start with      the next group.  Within a single      priority group, you can also set dependencies (similar to how Windows      Services set dependencies) so that a particular VM will not recover before      it’s dependencies have recovered (note-this is within a single priority      group and cannot span priority groups.)</li>
<li>Licensing – There are now two editions of SRM, Standard      and Enterprise.  Both are feature      identical.  Standard is for sites up      to 75 VMs and Enterprise is for sites up to 1000 VMs (the technical      limit).  All existing customers who      maintain support will get SRM Enterprise when they go to SRM5.  SRM Standard is a new offering for SMBs      and Remote Offices.  When customers      need to grow beyond 75 VMs at a site, they can upgrade their existing VMs      to SRM Enterprise and then continue buying SRM5 Enterprise VM-Packs.  Licensing still sold in packs of 25      VMs.  Only need to purchase for the      VMs that you are going to protect.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1704';
  addthis_title  = 'Site+Recovery+Manager+5%3A+The+BIG+Feature+List';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1704/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pause Site Recovery Manager to get the last copy of your data</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1632</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1632#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was installing Site Recovery Manager in Miami today for a customer who replicates to Atlanta.  I&#8217;ve been working with them the last few days to setup SRM and get their Protection Groups and Recovery Plans in place.  One suggestion that I made was to add a Message to their Recovery Plans to pause after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was installing Site Recovery Manager in Miami today for a customer who replicates to Atlanta.  I&#8217;ve been working with them the last few days to setup SRM and get their Protection Groups and Recovery Plans in place.  One suggestion that I made was to add a Message to their Recovery Plans to pause after the Shutdown of the Primary Site VMs.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why:  In a true failover in SRM, the first step of the Recovery Plan is to shut down all of the VMs in the primary site that are protected.  This is so that when the VMs restart in the recovery site, they do not conflict on the network with the original VMs.  Here in Miami the typical disaster is, of course, hurricanes.  Hurricanes are typically predictable with a decent notice.  I can then assume that my odds are higher than normal that when the person hits the failover button here, both sites are still available and I will be avoiding a disaster and not recovering from one.  For this reason, I recommended to my customer that they add a message in their recovery plan right above &#8220;Prepare Storage&#8221; in the Recovery Plan.  You can do this by right-clicking &#8220;Prepare Storage&#8221; and selecting &#8220;Add Message&#8221;.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1633 aligncenter" title="Screen shot 2011-03-31 at 11.02.34 AM" src="http://www.vmguy.com/uploads/Screen-shot-2011-03-31-at-11.02.34-AM-300x88.png" alt="" width="300" height="88" /></p>
<p>I added the following message to their Recovery Plan:</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">&#8220;<em>If this is a true failover and Miami is still available, perform a final replication of the storage to get the last transactions from Miami.  Once all replication is completed, you may click Continue.</em></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><em><br />
</em></div>
<div><em>If this is only a test of the plan, you may click Continue at any time</em>.&#8221;</div>
<div>My customer replicates hourly between sites.  If they were to start a failover 45 minutes after the last replication, they would lose the last 45 minutes of transactions when they ran the Recovery Plan.  SRM does not kick off replication in any way.  When we add the message above, we can have the storage admin run a final sync from the production site with the VM&#8217;s in a down state.  This will extent my Recovery Time Objective as it will add time to the whole plan to have to wait for the final replication to finish.  However, using this last replication, I can now get the final transactions over to the Recovery Site and minimize the clean up work on recovery.  Of course, you can script this last replication if you want to, however be very careful as there is no way to mark a script to run in failover mode only (vs. test mode).  You may not want a script to force a replication in both test mode and full recovery mode.</div>
<div>Just a little tip to optimize your Disaster Failover.  Now let&#8217;s hope we never need to use it.</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1632';
  addthis_title  = 'Pause+Site+Recovery+Manager+to+get+the+last+copy+of+your+data';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1632/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One week left before all the licensing changes &#8211; What you need to know.</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1556</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1556#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve taken about 5 emails from different customers this week on this topic so I felt it warranted a quick article.  There are two main changes coming one week from today: first, the sale on the upgrade to Enterprise Plus is about to end.  Second, some products are permanently switching to per-VM licensing (and maybe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken about 5 emails from different customers this week on this topic so I felt it warranted a quick article.  There are two main changes coming one week from today: first, the sale on the upgrade to Enterprise Plus is about to end.  Second, some products are permanently switching to per-VM licensing (and maybe for some, not for the better).  Both of these are changing on December 15th.  Make sure to read to the end for <em>my analysis</em> of the perVM licensing.</p>
<h3><strong>License Sale</strong></h3>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Upgrade to vSphere Enterprise for $495 per CPU</span> (normally $685/CPU) &#8211; Support and Subscription is required with purchase.  Pretty self-explanatory on <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/buy/editions_comparison.html" target="_blank">the differences</a>.  I&#8217;m a huge fan of <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vcenter-server/features.html#c1236" target="_blank">Host Profiles</a>, <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/vnetwork-distributed-switch/" target="_blank">distributed switches</a> and <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/storage-io-control/overview.html" target="_blank">storage IO control</a>.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/vsphere-promotion/view_capacityiq.html" target="_blank">50 Seats of View Premier with vSphere Enterprise Plus Upgrades</a></span> &#8211; Customers who purchase Enterprise Plus (Ent+) will get 50 concurrent Desktops of View Premier Edition and 1 year of Production Support and Subscription.  This promo also includes all of the bundles that upgrade vSphere to Ent+ (including the $495 upgrade above).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.vmware.com/landing_pages/vsphere-promotion/view_capacityiq.html" target="_blank">15 VMs of CapacityIQ with upgrades to Standard, Advanced, Enterprise and Ent+</a></span> &#8211; Customers who purchase or upgrade upgrade to any of these editions or bundles containing any of these editions get 15 VMs of CapIQ.  Essentials and Essentials Plus bundles are not eligible.</p>
<p>The official disclaimer from VMware: &#8220;VMware reserves the right to amend the terms, conditions and requirements of these promotions.  List Pricing is for reference purposes only and is subject to change without notice and my vary within region. Please refer to <a href="mailto:sales@vmguy.com">your reselling partner</a> or www.vmware.com for a quotation or actual product pricing.&#8221;</p>
<h3>PerVM Licensing</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/" target="_blank">CapIQ, AppSpeed, Chargeback, and Site Recovery Manager are switching to perVM licensing</a> from perCPU.  Customers can stay on their perCPU licenses or they can convert.  Customers who convert will get 10 VMs of Appspeed for each CPU, 10VMs of CapIQ for each CPU, 20 VMs of Chargeback for each CPU and 5 VMs of Site Recovery Manager per CPU, respectively.  As I mentioned, customers can stay on their existing licenses and renew support for them if they want.  They will not be able to buy any new perCPU licenses after December 15th, 2010 for these 4 products listed above.  This is where I see a bit of a storm brewing.  Customers who run many VMs per host and want to protect most of them are in for a bit of a rude awakening.</p>
<h3>My take on PerVM Licensing</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s say a customer runs SRM perCPU today.  They have 4 hosts running 100 VMs total and SRM protects them all.  Each host has 2 CPUs.  In the old licensing model, they needed 8 CPUs of SRM that retailed for $1,750 each.  8 x 1,750 = $14,000 (let&#8217;s exclude Support and Subscription for the moment to make the numbers easier but I recognize that SnS is required).  Under the new model, the PerVM licensing comes in packs of 25 VMs.  For our example we need 4 packs of 25 VMs that retail for $11,250 each or 4 x 11,250 = $45,000.  Yes, you just read that right.  The customers cost for SRM in our example just went from $14k to $45k.</p>
<p>The new licensing does benefit some customers however.  Those with large farms that want to protect a minority of their VMs.  Those customers can now just buy a pack of VMs and protect only the ones they need.  They can even split the licenses between sites and cross-replicate.  This is where this licensing model really helps.  It helps the customers who just want to do <em>some</em> SRM.</p>
<p>The last point I want to make is <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/per-vm-faq.html#q21" target="_blank">buried in</a> the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/per-vm-faq.html" target="_blank">FAQ on PerVM Licensing</a>.  If you are currently running perCPU SRM in a cluster, if you need to add a host after December 15th and you need SRM licenses for that new host, you will need to convert your licenses at a ratio of 5:1 for SRM and then purchase perVM for all your existing protected VMs that are not covered by your converted licenses.  I have a bad feeling this is going to be a wakeup call for some customers.  Another note: there&#8217;s no switching back.  Once you go perVM, you cannot go back to perCPU.</p>
<p>I try very hard to look out for my customers and keep them informed.  These licensing changes may benefit some customers wanting to start out with a small number of protected VMs with SRM.  However, most of my SRM customers are like the $45k example shown above.  I don&#8217;t see these licensing changes being a benefit to them.  Normally, I don&#8217;t discuss licensing in my blog articles.  Some customers have negative attitudes when it comes to licensing.  Some maybe got burned in the past, or just don&#8217;t like to talk about spending money.  My goal here is to make sure you can see how these changes can affect you <em>before</em> the impending deadline.  Sometimes I can see a storm brewing from off in the distance.  I just hope that the storm does not cause a disaster, the likes of which even SRM cannot recover from.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1556';
  addthis_title  = 'One+week+left+before+all+the+licensing+changes+%26%238211%3B+What+you+need+to+know.';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1556/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separating the Windows Page File for Site Recovery Manager replication</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1525</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1525#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a very interesting discussion with a customer about optimizing their storage replication for use with Site Recovery Manager.  We discussed the best practice of separating the VMware ESX VM swap files as per The SRM Best Practices Guide.  He was aware of that design suggestion and had already taken the initial steps to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a very interesting discussion with a customer about optimizing their storage replication for use with Site Recovery Manager.  We discussed the best practice of separating the VMware ESX VM swap files as per <em><a href="http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/VMware-vCenter-SRM-WP-EN.pdf" target="_blank">The SRM Best Practices Guide</a></em>.  He was aware of that design suggestion and had already taken the initial steps to implement it.  He then went on to ask me if it would be beneficial to seperate out the Windows Page File onto a non-replicated datastore.  I had never heard of that suggestion before.  It seemed logical to do so.  If we shouldn&#8217;t replicate the VM swap file, why replicate the Windows Paging file?  They both perform similar functions at different layers of the software stack.  I powered up my web browser and headed over to Google for some searching.</p>
<p>I found a few references here and there.  Most customers keep the paging file inside the standard VM disks to avoid making the environment too complex.  I was about to give up and suggest he not separate the paging file, until I came across <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/message/1545028" target="_blank">this discussion in the VMware communities</a>.  <span id="more-1525"></span>I was stunned to see one customer report that they were seeing a reduction of 60% of the replication traffic on certain VMs.  They even saw a 80% reduction of replicated traffic from one of their Citrix servers.  Now I was cooking.  This was amazing and made perfect sense to me how some servers could be more defined by this than others.  I was off to find a documented procedure from VMware to do so.  Unfortunately I came up empty in the Knowledge Base, white papers and best practices.  If you know of such a VMware documented procedure, please post in the comments with a reference link and I will update my article.</p>
<p>After reviewing the communities discussion line-by-line, I came across <a href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3671.pdf" target="_blank">this NetApp SRM technical paper</a> written by Jeremy Merill and Larry Touchette (whom I was fortunate enough to work with while I was at NetApp).  It contains some great procedures for optimizing NetApp storage and Site Recovery Manager.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Beginning on page 41</span> however, is a great vendor-agnostic procedure for separating out the Windows Paging file to reduce it&#8217;s impact on storage replication.  Jackpot.  Basically there are a few points to consider.  First the windows swap file is configured for a specific drive letter and path.  How do you make sure the recovered machine gets the same drive letter when it comes up in the recovery plan?  The answer is in the procedure.  Jeremy and Larry describe how to configure the source VM with it&#8217;s Windows Paging file seperated.  Then they clone the VMDK where the paging file resides and copy it to the destination side.  The reason they do this is because the disk has a signature on it that tells Windows what drive letter it is.  Then they altered the recovery plan for SRM to mount that destination disk to the VM before it powers on.  So that when the recovery VM does come online, it has it&#8217;s page file disk as the same letter with the page file intact.  Because the Windows paging file gets wiped on every boot, the data in it is not important, only the location where it&#8217;s stored.  They repeat this procedure for every VM in the recovery plan.  I realize that this could be a large undertaking to separate all these page files but the more VMs, the more replication data saved.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very curious if some have tried separating out the page file and what replication improvements you have seen.  Please report those in the comments if you have tried it.  I&#8217;d love to hear the results.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1525';
  addthis_title  = 'Separating+the+Windows+Page+File+for+Site+Recovery+Manager+replication';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1525/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRM Per-VM licensing coming September 1</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may remember from a recent article that I wrote about the VMware licensing dilemmas, that one of the scenarios I mentioned was SRM licensing when a customer wants to protect only a small percentage of VMs.  In the per-CPU licensing model, a customer would have to license all of the CPUs in a cluster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember from a recent article that I wrote about the <a href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1413" target="_blank">VMware licensing dilemmas</a>, that one of the scenarios I mentioned was SRM licensing when a customer wants to protect only a small percentage of VMs.  In the per-CPU licensing model, a customer would have to license all of the CPUs in a cluster even if they wanted to protect only 10% of the VMs.  VMware <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/index.html" target="_blank">has announced</a> that Per-VM licensing will be available on September 1, 2010.  Customers will now be able to license SRM on a Per-VM basis.  Customers who like their per-CPU model will be able to continue that purchasing method until December 15, 2010.  After that, it&#8217;s per-VM only.</p>
<p>There are a few things to think about with regard to licensing  first, vSphere 4.1 now allows for <a href="http://searchvmware.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid179_gci1516818,00.html" target="_blank">DRS affinity</a> so that VMs only move between certain hosts of a cluster.  I&#8217;m still waiting for a definite answer from my VMware friends but that <em>should</em> allow you to protect some VM&#8217;s and set their DRS Affinity to only the hosts that you own SRM CPUs for and still keep the full cluster for the unprotected VMs. Previously, VMware would recommend that you create a separate cluster for your &#8220;protected&#8221; VMs if they were a small subset of the whole.  Now with DRS Affinity, you can dictate that certain &#8220;protected&#8221; VMs only move between a subset of a cluster.  We&#8217;ll still have to wait and see the final ruling from VMware but I&#8217;m thinking that would work in the short-term for those in the per-CPU dilemma.</p>
<p>The second feature of the new licensing that I really like is the rolling average of VMs over the last twelve months.  What that translates to is that now I need to buy what my daily average of VMs protected would be over a 12 month period.  If I have certain points of the year where my VM count spikes, this average would be monitored by vCenter and alarm if I am going over my licensing limits.  However, I would only need the average number of protected VMs over the past year.  The system will continue to run after going over your limit but that&#8217;s definitely not something I would condone (Famous VMware SE saying: ethics don&#8217;t ship in the box people).</p>
<p>The per-vm licenses are sold in blocks of 25 and range from $1,250 to $11,250 depending on the product.  Per-vm licensing will be available for Chargeback, Appspeed, SRM, and, later this year, CapacityIQ.  You can find more information on VMware&#8217;s website <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/licensing/per-vm/index.html" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>The last question I had was, &#8220;How do I know what my rolling average is for those licenses?&#8221;  The good news is that once you enter in a license key, the new <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vsphere4/doc/vsp_41_new_feat.html#management" target="_blank">license reporting manager</a> in vSphere 4.1 will tell you what your rolling average is year-to-date.  Looks like someone was planning ahead.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1433';
  addthis_title  = 'SRM+Per-VM+licensing+coming+September+1';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1433/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The VMware licensing dilemmas</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1413</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1413#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way I see it, there are two dilemmas that VMware has in the way their licensing is designed today.  One of them works against VMware and one works against VMware customers (or at least makes it harder for them).  The former is definitely the bigger of the two so lets discuss that one first.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I see it, there are two dilemmas that VMware has in the way their licensing is designed today.  One of them works against VMware and one works against VMware customers (or at least makes it harder for them).  The former is definitely the bigger of the two so lets discuss that one first.  This topic comes up frequently when new versions of ESX are coming out.  We&#8217;ve already <a href="http://virtualization.info/en/news/2010/05/vsphere-4-1-features-leak.html" target="_blank">heard that an update is coming this year</a> so I figured that since today is the half-way point in the year, this was a good time to bring up the topic again.</p>
<p>You probably noticed by now that there is a limitation in Standard and Enterprise editions of vSphere to a maximum of 6-cores per CPU.  The Advanced and Enterprise-Plus editions of vSphere have a licensed limit of 12-cores per CPU.  Now that Intel&#8217;s 8-core CPUs and AMD&#8217;s 12-cores are out, what&#8217;s next?  Intel and AMD are sure to develop a proc with more than 12 cores (and probably sooner than we all think).  What will happen to VMware&#8217;s licensing then?  You have to remember that from a revenue standpoint, when a 24 core proc comes out, customers will be able to run twice as many workloads on that proc (or at least 50% more).  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law" target="_blank">Moore&#8217;s Law</a> states that processing performance of CPUs will double every two years.  With the processors doubling in power so quickly, customers are typically not doubling their number of VMs in the same time period.  The result is that customers tend to have a diminishing need to increase their ESX per-CPU licensing.  I know that there are exceptions to this rule, but in the SMB space the majority are not growing that fast (at least not in this economy).  The increase in processor performance actually works against VMware&#8217;s current licensing model. It not good to have a direct connection between your main revenue stream and someone else&#8217;s CPU release schedule.  What will happen?  What&#8217;s the right answer?  Your guess is as good as mine.  Will they go to a per-vm model?  Increase their current limits?  Find some middle-ground between the two?  Will they &#8220;grandfather&#8221; their customers like AT&amp;T did with the iPad data plans?  Only VMware knows.  My opinion is that this is an issue that has to be dealt with eventually.  Maybe this will be the year, maybe next.</p>
<p>The second licensing dilemma that I run into is in Site Recovery Manager.  It&#8217;s no secret that SRM is my favorite non-ESX product from VMware.  As you probably know, SRM is licensed by the physical CPU where the protected virtual machines reside or could reside.  Here&#8217;s where that model breaks down:  let&#8217;s say I have a smaller customer who&#8217;s policy is only to have a DR plan for 5 of their most critical Virtual Machines.  Those five VMs run in a cluster comprise of 5 dual CPU hosts with HA and DRS enabled.  According to the SRM licensing model, I need 10 CPUs of SRM for those 5 VMs.  That does not fly well.  The solution I&#8217;ve heard some engineers mention is to create a separate smaller cluster for just the protected VMs.  I&#8217;m not fond of that idea because it goes against the consolidation principal.  I&#8217;ve never felt that lowering your consolidation ratio was justified because it did not fit a licensing model.</p>
<p>I know there are people much smarter than me at work trying to find a solution to both of these scenarios.  I&#8217;m hopeful that they will get resolved in a way that&#8217;s fair to both sides.  Maybe this is the year, maybe it is not.  Either way, we&#8217;ve made it thru half of 2010, perhaps the answers lie in the last 6 months of the year.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1413';
  addthis_title  = 'The+VMware+licensing+dilemmas';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1413/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change Block Tracking and why you care</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1351</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1351#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips and Tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vReplicator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmguy.com/wordpress/?p=1351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was assisting a customer this week in upgrading to vSphere and installing and running vReplicator from Vizioncore.  vReplicator is not a complex product but works well for what it does: replicate VMs.  During the install of vReplicator, we setup replication for a few VMs.  The product has a few options for how to determine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was assisting a customer this week in upgrading to vSphere and installing and running vReplicator from Vizioncore.  vReplicator is not a complex product but works well for what it does: replicate VMs.  During the install of vReplicator, we setup replication for a few VMs.  The product has a few options for how to determine what to replicate.  Since we were now on ESX4 on source and target, I suggested we use Changed Block Tracking mode (CBT) for replication.</p>
<p>When I suggested CBT to the customer they asked, “Why that one?” and how it worked.  So I explained:  When we replicate from source to target, the first copy is a full copy of the data (the “seed” it is often called).  When we go to replicate the next time, we don’t want to replicate the whole thing again, just what has changed since the last time we replicated (often called a “differential”).  The replication software needs to determine what’s changed.  Prior to ESX 4, there was not a built in method to do this.  The software would have to find another method, such as compare snapshot information and determine which blocks are new.  That uses CPU cycles on the ESX hosts and takes time (differential mode in vReplicator takes  roughly 1 minute per GB of VM data).  On the other hand, CBT is a feature in ESX4 that tracks the block changes that have occurred since a point in time.  It does not keep a copy of the changed data in a separate location, just a log that the blocks in question have changed.  This is a huge help to backup and replication technologies who typically have to determine what has changed on the disks via their own methods.  Now, ESX can tell them directly what has changed and they can get right to copying those changed blocks.  This makes the overall replication and backup jobs much quicker.</p>
<p>Now for a few lessons learned in using it.  First, it requires hardware version 7 VM’s (HW7) and ESX4.  VM’s need to have their VMtools upgraded to the latest version and then you can upgrade the VMs to HW7 when they are powered off via right clicking them (this updates the virtual hardware presented to the VMs and will require another reboot in Windows after powering it on when the OS discovers the new virtual HW and loads the drivers – thanks Microsoft!).  Second, CBT it is not on by default.  It is set per VM and is an advanced option you can set in the VM’s config.  Some software have the capability to change the CBT setting for you.  In our case, vReplicator has this option on the CBT options page.  On that page, it will check every VM that it can see and if they are HW7.  If they are HW7, they will show as supported.  On that screen, you will also see a checkbox for the “enabled” field.  When you click the enabled box on your HW7 VMs, vReplicator makes the change for you in the VM’s configuration.  However, as mentioned earlier, you must completely power down that VM and power it back on.  The reason for this is that, to start using it, ESX needs to create the tracking log for each disk (the log is about .5MB for ever GB of VMDK or Virtual Mapped RDM and it’s stored with the VM) and ESX only does this setup process at VM boot time.  So make note, a restart won’t work.  It has to be a VM power down and VM power back on.  There is a great article that taught me a few things on CBT by Eric Siebert that goes into a little more technical detail and you can find it <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/what-is-changed-block-tracking-in-vsphere/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Once we got this process completed, my customer’s replication jobs ran MUCH faster.  The data being copied from the source to the target was the same, but the time it took vReplicator to determine what to replicate went from minutes to seconds.  Great news too was that we were able to change the replication method on the fly (from Differential to CBT, if you’re using hybrid, I think you need to re-seed).</p>
<p>My final advice, is make sure you understand if your backup/replication software can use CBT and what you need to enable it.  It does take a bit of work to upgrade the tools and virtual hardware (use Update Manager!).  However it’s well worth it in the long run.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1351';
  addthis_title  = 'Change+Block+Tracking+and+why+you+care';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1351/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New SRAs available in January</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1321</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1321#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now, most of you know how Site Recovery Manager works.  SRM requires a SRA (Storage Replication Adapter) which is basically a translator to allow SRM talk directly to the storage arrays.  6 of the SRAs were updated on VMware&#8217;s download site for SRM in January.  They were: Dell EqualLogics, Version 1.0.2, Released 01/20/2010 EMC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, most of you know how Site Recovery Manager works.  SRM requires a SRA (Storage Replication Adapter) which is basically a translator to allow SRM talk directly to the storage arrays.  6 of the SRAs were updated on <a href="http://www.vmware.com/downloads/download.do?downloadGroup=SRM400" target="_blank">VMware&#8217;s download site for SRM</a> in January.  They were:</p>
<p>Dell EqualLogics, Version 1.0.2, Released 01/20/2010</p>
<p>EMC Celerra, Version 4.0.17, Released 01/29/2010</p>
<p>Fujitsu ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager, Version 1.3| Released 01/29/2010</p>
<p>IBM DS4000/5000, Version 01.01.35.05, Released 01/15/2010</p>
<p>IBM N-series SAN Adapter, Version 1.4.2, Released 01/07/2010</p>
<p>LSI, Version 1.01.30.05, Released 01/21/2010</p>
<p>You can find the updated SRAs on the SRM download site <a href="http://www.vmware.com/downloads/download.do?downloadGroup=SRM400" target="_blank">here</a>.  As always, please check to make sure these updates are necessary for your environment.  I would have included the release notes but unfortunately the vendors are not keep track of them.  Upgrade at your own risk, and if you do, please test your recovery plans out fully with the new adapters.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1321';
  addthis_title  = 'New+SRAs+available+in+January';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1321/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release: VMware Site Recovery Manager 4.0</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1175</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, Site Recovery Manager 4.0 has been released.  Here&#8217;s the what&#8217;s new section from the release notes: This release of Site Recovery Manager introduces several new features: Full compatibility with vCenter 4. Full support for NFS-based arrays. Support for shared recovery sites. Enables many-to-one pairings of protected sites with a recovery site. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At long last, Site Recovery Manager 4.0 has been released.  Here&#8217;s the what&#8217;s new section from the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/srm/srm_releasenotes_4_0.html" target="_blank">release notes</a>:</p>
<p>This release of Site Recovery Manager introduces several new features:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Full compatibility with vCenter 4.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Full support for NFS-based arrays.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Support for shared recovery sites.</strong><br />
Enables many-to-one pairings of protected sites with a recovery site. For more information, see the technical note <em>Installing, Configuring, and Using Shared Recovery Site Support</em>, which is available at <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/srm_pubs.html">http://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/srm_pubs.html</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Resilience in the face of vCenter unavailability during a test recovery.</strong><br />
Placeholder virtual machines can be quickly repaired after the protected site vCenter becomes available again.</li>
<li><strong>New repair-mode installation features.</strong><br />
You can run the SRM installer in repair mode if you need to change configuration parameters such as vCenter credentials, database connection information or credentials, and certificate details.</li>
<li><strong>Graphical interface to advanced settings.</strong><br />
Eliminates most requirements to edit the XML configuration file</li>
<li><strong>Support for DB2 as an SRM database server.</strong></li>
<li><strong>New licensing options.</strong></li>
<li><strong>Improved scalability.</strong><br />
A single protection group can now include up to 1000 virtual machines.</li>
<li><strong>Full Compatibility With DPM (Distributed Power Management)</strong><br />
SRM recovery plans can now power-on or power-off a host that is in standby mode.</li>
<li><strong>New Option to dr-ip-customizer Utility</strong><br />
The dr-ip-customizer utility now logs less verbose diagnostic output by default. To force dr-ip-customizer to log the same level of diagnostic output that it produced in earlier releases, use the -verbose option.</li>
<li><strong>Change in Certificate Validation</strong><br />
When you select certificate authentication, the SRM installation validates the certificate you supply before continuing. Certificates signed with an MD5 key are no longer allowed.</li>
<li><strong>Support for Protecting Fault-Tolerant Virtual Machines.</strong><br />
SRM can now protect virtual machines that have been configured for fault-tolerant operation. When recovered, these virtual machines lose their fault tolerance, and must be manually reconfigured after recovery to restore fault tolerance.</li>
<li><strong>Improved context-sensitive Help.</strong></li>
<li><strong>PDF documents available on release media</strong><br />
Current versions of the PDF documents for this release are available in the <em>docs</em> folder at the root of the SRM 4.0 CD. Updated versions of these documents may be available at <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/srm_pubs.html">http://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/srm_pubs.html</a>.</li>
</ul>
<div>You can find the download in the download section <a href="https://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/datacenter_downloads/vmware_vcenter_site_recovery_manager/4_0" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<p><a name="compatibility"></a></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1175';
  addthis_title  = 'Release%3A+VMware+Site+Recovery+Manager+4.0';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1175/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting more advanced with VMware View</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1144</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1144#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going over the KB digest this morning and saw a few KB articles that hit home with a couple issues that customers have been asking me about regarding View. The first is wondering how an admin can do more advanced things with the View Manager Server.  For instance: assign a default desktop out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going over the KB digest this morning and saw a few KB articles that hit home with a couple issues that customers have been asking me about regarding View.</p>
<p>The first is wondering how an admin can do more advanced things with the View Manager Server.  For instance: assign a default desktop out of a pool to a specific user or  listing orphaned desktops (users that no longer exist or have changed permissions and no longer have access to a desktop in a pool but still have one assigned to them) or cleaning up after removing a secondary View Manager server.  All of these items can be performed by a little-known command line utility included in View called vdmadmin.exe. <span id="more-1144"></span> vdmadmin.exe can do all of the things mentioned.  The tool is installed by default with view in the  C:\Program Files\VMware\VMware View\Server\bin directory.  You can read all of the details about the tool and all of the command options <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/viewmanager_cl_tool.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> .  &quot;Why is this a command-line tool?&quot; you ask.  When features are requested for the GUI, a programmer has to create and test the GUI options which takes a lot of time.  The product manager has to decide what features will make in into the released product and still keep it on time for release.  Sometime features or controls don&#8217;t make it but are still important.  A developer can write a command line executable and they are much easier to test as the command line either works or it does not.  The Quality Assurance process is much easier for command line utilities.</p>
<p>Another tool that&#8217;s good to know is sviconfig.exe.  It&#8217;s located on the vCenter server where you install composer in the C:\Program Files\VMware\VMware View Composer directory.  This tool allows you to unlock protected entities in vCenter.  For instance, if a user checks out a VM offline, it gets protected in vCenter so that an admin cannot accidentally delete it or power it on and make changes.  If the admin needs to make changes to it for some reason they can use the sviconfig tool to unlock that VM.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a few other topics that come up frequently.  Here are a few:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Can you protect View Desktops with Site Recovery Manager?</span> Unfortunately, SRM is not &quot;View aware&quot; as yet.  The work is underway however.  Tommy Walker from VMware (one of the best @ VMware) has written a blueprint with EMC on how to accomplish this task (although experimental at this point).  It&#8217;s pretty interesting reading and I&#8217;m very hopeful that we&#8217;ll see native integration coming.  You can read the very detailed blueprint <a href="http://www.vdi.com/upload_desc.php?user=57&amp;upid=38" target="_blank">here</a> (registration required).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What features do I get with thin client &quot;x&quot;?</span> With the different number of <a href="http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/pdf/vi_view_guide.pdf" target="_blank">options available</a> for View Thin Clients there&#8217;s also a number of different thin client OS options.  <a href="http://blogs.vmware.com/view/2009/06/view-thin-client-feature-matrix.html" target="_blank">Here</a> is a great matrix of what features you get with each View client that is available.  Good information to know when picking out thin clients</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">How can I make location-aware desktops?</span> This is a common question.  How can I make a specific thin client map a specific printer, etc based on the thin client location?  The answer: Client Information Variables.  <a href="http://blogs.vmware.com/view/2009/05/vmwre-view-client-variables.html" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s</a> a nice writeup on some basic scripting that can determine the variables and make appropriate decisions based on their values.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Can I use group policy to control the client or desktop agent?</span> You bet.  You can find the administrative templates for group policy in the C:\Program Files\VMware\View Manager\Server\Extras\GroupPolicyFiles directory.  If you&#8217;re not too sure about using adm files, <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816662/en-us" target="_blank">here&#8217;s a kb article</a> from Microsoft on how to use and manage them.  There are 4 included with View: vdm-agent.adm to control the agent in the guest OS, vdm_client.adm to control the properties of the View client, vdm_server.adm to control the connection broker and vdm_common.adm for common View components across all of View.  A very detailed list of the options of each can be found in the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/pdf/view31_manual.pdf" target="_blank">View admin guide</a> starting on page 176.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F1144';
  addthis_title  = 'Getting+more+advanced+with+VMware+View';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1144/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release: Data Recovery 1.0.1</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/973</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/973#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a huge fan of Data Recovery.  It&#8217;s very bare-bones but it does what it sets out to do.  I&#8217;m hoping to have a review of Data Recovery completed later this week.  In the mean time, v1.0.1 was released Friday (the releases keep on rolling).  You can download the new version here. This release is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a huge fan of Data Recovery.  It&#8217;s very bare-bones but it does what it sets out to do.  I&#8217;m hoping to have a review of Data Recovery completed later this week.  In the mean time, v1.0.1 was released Friday (<a href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/category/vmware-news/software-releases" target="_blank">the releases keep on rolling</a>).  You can download the new version <a href="http://www.vmware.com/downloads/download.do?downloadGroup=DATARECOVERY10" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>This release is all bug fixes, here&#8217;s the list from the <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vdr/doc/vdr_101_releasenotes.html" target="_blank">release notes</a>:</p>
<p>The following issues have been resolved since the last release of Data Recovery. For a full list of known existing issues, see <a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/vdr/doc/vdr_10_releasenotes.html" target="_blank">VMware Data Recovery 1.0 Release Notes</a>. The list of resolved issues below pertains to this release of Data Recovery only.<span id="more-973"></span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Large Temporary Files Removed as Expected<!--VMDK File Settings Managed as Expected--></strong>Data Recovery modifies virtual machines&#8217; vmdk files&#8217; settings so a snapshot can be created for backup purposes. In the past, after the backup has been created, the vmdk file&#8217;s settings was sometimes left configured for snapshots even after the backup was complete. This led to these virtual machines being left in snapshot mode while accumulating snapshots that were undetected by vSphere Client. This process has been redesigned so that these temporary files are no longer be left behind. In previous versions of Data Recovery, this issue can be resolved by following the process described in the knowledge base article titled &#8220;Delete ddb.delete entries and snapshots left behind by Vmware Data Recovery&#8221;.</li>
<p><!-- 404093 --></p>
<li><strong>Backups Can Be Completed While Integrity Checks Are Running</strong>Data Recovery can complete backup operations at the same time that an integrity check is running. In the past, when an integrity check was running, backups could not be completed.</li>
<p><!-- 397522 --></p>
<li><strong>Improved Integrity Check Backup Speed</strong>Integrity check has been optimized for faster performance. In the past, comparable integrity checks took longer to complete.</li>
<p><!-- 412862 --></p>
<li><strong>Improved VMotion Licensing Support</strong>Virtual machines can be moved between hosts using VMotion without producing licensing issues. In the past, if a virtual machine was moved between hosts using VMotion, licensing checks sometimes produced errors.</li>
<p><!-- 402659 --></p>
<li><strong>Reduced Data Recovery Backup Appliance Shutdown Time</strong>The Data Recovery Backup appliance now shuts down more quickly than it did before. In the past, the appliance often took 15 minutes to shutdown.</li>
<p><!-- 423703? --></p>
<li><strong>Improved Support for Different Time Zones</strong>In the past, Data Recovery did not consistently handle time zones with positive offsets relative to GMT. For example, Data Recovery could encounter issues with data associated with the Paris time zone, which has an offset of +1, whereas data associated with the New York time zone, which has an offset of -5 was handled as expected. These issues no longer occur.</li>
<p><!-- 422695 --></p>
<li><strong>Data Recovery Supported with Essentials Plus Licenses</strong>Data Recovery is included in Essentials Plus licenses. In the past, using Data Recovery with Essentials Plus licenses failed. Backup jobs created with Essentials Plus licenses failed with the error, <code>License not available to perform operation. Feature hotplug not licensed...</code>.</li>
<p><!-- 422695 --></p>
<li><strong>Integrity Check Optimized to Run During Idle Times</strong>Before running regularly scheduled integrity checks, the Backup Appliance determines if the current time is during a backup window. If the current time is not during a backup window, the integrity check runs. If the current time is during a backup window, the backup appliance checks the backup schedule to determine if there will be a time in the next 24 hours that will not be during a backup window. If there is a time in the next 24 hours that is not during a backup window, the Backup Appliance waits for that time. If there is no time that is not during a backup window in the next 24 hours, the Backup Appliance completes the integrity check.</li>
</ul>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F973';
  addthis_title  = 'Release%3A+Data+Recovery+1.0.1';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/973/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does Fault Tolerance prevent a split brain scenario?</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/844</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fault Tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m training all of my partner engineers this week and they always ask the toughest technical questions.  Thanks to Scott Phillips for asking me this one: What does Fault Tolerance do to prevent a split brain if both Primary and Secondary VMs become isolated? Fault Tolerance (FT) uses an on-disk generation number file.  When FT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m training all of my partner engineers this week and they always ask the toughest technical questions.  Thanks to Scott Phillips for asking me this one:</p>
<p>What does Fault Tolerance do to prevent a split brain if both Primary and Secondary VMs become isolated?</p>
<p>Fault Tolerance (FT) uses an on-disk generation number file.  When FT is enabled the primary VM creates a file on shared storage called generation.N where N is a counter number.  The secondary VM is started and when it connects to the primary, the primary tells the secondary what the generation number is.  Once the Primary or secondary detects that there is a failure in the other half of the VM pair, it will try to rename the generation.N file to generation.N+1.  If the rename succeeds, the VM takes over as being the Primary (or remains the primary if it already was) and takes corrective action to rebuild a secondary and become protected again.  If the rename of the generation.N file fails, that means that the other VM in the pair already renamed the file and took over and the current VM shuts down.</p>
<p>There you have it, the disk subsystem prevents both VM&#8217;s from becoming the primary at the same time and creating a split brain.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F844';
  addthis_title  = 'How+does+Fault+Tolerance+prevent+a+split+brain+scenario%3F';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/844/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Recovery Manager by example</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30</link>
		<comments>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celerra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Recovery Manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite things in talking to people is when they tell me how well the software I teach them about works.  Even better is when someone will take the time to blog about their experiences.  I have had a few customers become early adopters of Site Recovery Manager.  One of the most memorable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite things in talking to people is when they tell me how well the software I teach them about works.  Even better is when someone will take the time to blog about their experiences.  I have had a few customers become early adopters of Site Recovery Manager.  One of the most memorable was a customer (let&#8217;s call him Virtual_JTW) whom I worked with in September.  On a Friday afternoon we ran thru configuring and setting up SRM in his environment.  We worked thru the configuration and integration with his Celerra storage.  In the end, we passed with flying colors and his Disaster Recovery test was 100% successful.  It was fun and exciting for me to watch Virtual_JTW&#8217;s reaction to the success of the test.  He felt so impressed by the results and his subsequent demonstration for his Disaster Recovery team, he felt the need to blog on the whole experience.  You can read his account of what happened as well as the test results <a href="http://communities.vmware.com/blogs/ManualAutomation/2008/10/07/site-recovery-manager-is-a-hit" target="_blank">here</a> .</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fvmguy.com%2Fwordpress%2Findex.php%2Farchives%2F30';
  addthis_title  = 'Site+Recovery+Manager+by+example';
  addthis_pub    = 'thevmguy';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/30/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

