<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VirtualCenter, run it on physical or virtual?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67</link>
	<description>Virtualization for the little guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny Alaniz</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny Alaniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-484</guid>
		<description>We currently run our VC on a VM as well and its works great.  Question is that, the Tomcat process utilizes a high amount of memory...  any thoughts on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We currently run our VC on a VM as well and its works great.  Question is that, the Tomcat process utilizes a high amount of memory&#8230;  any thoughts on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimC</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>TimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-37</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;ve stuck one of our vCenter servers in a virtual machine.  This appears to be the only one having an issue.  When you edit a virtual machine on the ESX server managed by this vCenter, even if you don&#039;t change anything, when you click ok, it goes to &quot;reconfigure virtual machine&quot;: this process takes 5+ minutes.  Don&#039;t know if the two are related or not, have you ever seen anything similar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve stuck one of our vCenter servers in a virtual machine.  This appears to be the only one having an issue.  When you edit a virtual machine on the ESX server managed by this vCenter, even if you don&#8217;t change anything, when you click ok, it goes to &#8220;reconfigure virtual machine&#8221;: this process takes 5+ minutes.  Don&#8217;t know if the two are related or not, have you ever seen anything similar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this blog and the VMware link.
I am working on a new VMware ESX setup for my agency and I was going to go physical but after reading this I will go virtual for it.
With sufficient UPS protection and our relatively small cluster (2 hosts, maybe 3) I don&#039;t expect any major crashes that could screw up the SQL database, and I will have backups of this VM anyway.
Thank you, Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this blog and the VMware link.<br />
I am working on a new VMware ESX setup for my agency and I was going to go physical but after reading this I will go virtual for it.<br />
With sufficient UPS protection and our relatively small cluster (2 hosts, maybe 3) I don&#8217;t expect any major crashes that could screw up the SQL database, and I will have backups of this VM anyway.<br />
Thank you, Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lund</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Nice write up, this is something we will be looking at, and I have been told that virtual is the way to go, for the reasons above.

Roger L

http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up, this is something we will be looking at, and I have been told that virtual is the way to go, for the reasons above.</p>
<p>Roger L</p>
<p><a href="http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Chambers</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Nice blog, Dave!

We had the same &quot;physical or virtual?&quot; discussion over on VIOPS - http://viops.vmware.com/home/message/1359

We also ran a poll to see who was running VC on physical/virtual - http://viops.vmware.com/home/poll.jspa?poll=1014 

The result was... it was a split - VC in a VM 53%, VC on Physical 47%...

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog, Dave!</p>
<p>We had the same &#8220;physical or virtual?&#8221; discussion over on VIOPS &#8211; <a href="http://viops.vmware.com/home/message/1359" rel="nofollow">http://viops.vmware.com/home/message/1359</a></p>
<p>We also ran a poll to see who was running VC on physical/virtual &#8211; <a href="http://viops.vmware.com/home/poll.jspa?poll=1014" rel="nofollow">http://viops.vmware.com/home/poll.jspa?poll=1014</a> </p>
<p>The result was&#8230; it was a split &#8211; VC in a VM 53%, VC on Physical 47%&#8230;</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/67/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=67#comment-8</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a best practice to disable DRS for the VC. That way you will always know where the VC VM resides in case of a multiple node isolation response for instance or a complete power down. other wise you will have to look on every single node to find the one where it was registered last.

But I completely agree, run it virtual! And with the upcoming vCenter Appliance you can bet on it that this will be the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a best practice to disable DRS for the VC. That way you will always know where the VC VM resides in case of a multiple node isolation response for instance or a complete power down. other wise you will have to look on every single node to find the one where it was registered last.</p>
<p>But I completely agree, run it virtual! And with the upcoming vCenter Appliance you can bet on it that this will be the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

