<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fault Tolerant capable CPUs that are not Fault Tolerant compatible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219</link>
	<description>Virtualization for the little guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VMguy</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Correct, currently you can not do SMP VM&#039;s as Fault Tolerant pairs.  However, having said that, I don&#039;t believe any other hypervisors can do Fault Tolerance at all if I&#039;m not mistaken.  (Sorry if I sound a little arrogant there, it&#039;s just really cool technology that no one else does).

-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, currently you can not do SMP VM&#8217;s as Fault Tolerant pairs.  However, having said that, I don&#8217;t believe any other hypervisors can do Fault Tolerance at all if I&#8217;m not mistaken.  (Sorry if I sound a little arrogant there, it&#8217;s just really cool technology that no one else does).</p>
<p>-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Donoghue</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Donoghue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-648</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that, after going through the bother of matching processors on multiple servers, VMware FT can make use of only one core per processor. VMware FT is not SMP compatible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that, after going through the bother of matching processors on multiple servers, VMware FT can make use of only one core per processor. VMware FT is not SMP compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Datto</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Datto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to add that less expensive AMD Athlon X2 Kuma model CPUs and AMD X4 Phenom 9650 CPUs will do VMware FT with Opteron Quad 1352, 1354, 1356 CPUs (or between themselves), although not in a supported configuration since only the Opteron CPUs are supported.

Also, expanding upon what was said above about VMware FT not working with nested ESX hosts, it may appear that VMware FT works initially but after a short while the syncing efforts between the Primary and the Secondary VMs can&#039;t keep up and eventually communication with the Secondary VM will stop.

Datto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add that less expensive AMD Athlon X2 Kuma model CPUs and AMD X4 Phenom 9650 CPUs will do VMware FT with Opteron Quad 1352, 1354, 1356 CPUs (or between themselves), although not in a supported configuration since only the Opteron CPUs are supported.</p>
<p>Also, expanding upon what was said above about VMware FT not working with nested ESX hosts, it may appear that VMware FT works initially but after a short while the syncing efforts between the Primary and the Secondary VMs can&#8217;t keep up and eventually communication with the Secondary VM will stop.</p>
<p>Datto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The VMguy</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>The VMguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-637</guid>
		<description>Yes, vCenter will check to make sure that FT will work before you enable it.  You can also use the site survey tool to find out if you can use FT on your hardware before you install it (http://www.vmware.com/download/shared_utilities.html).

You cannot run FT when running ESX nested (Esx running inside a VM).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, vCenter will check to make sure that FT will work before you enable it.  You can also use the site survey tool to find out if you can use FT on your hardware before you install it (<a href="http://www.vmware.com/download/shared_utilities.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/download/shared_utilities.html</a>).</p>
<p>You cannot run FT when running ESX nested (Esx running inside a VM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael McNamara</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael McNamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

I appreciate the great information you provide on this blog, top notch stuff.

We implemented VMWare&#039;s vSphere 4 a few months back and heard this limitation repeated by both VMWare&#039;s folks and the reseller we had engaged to help us. I don&#039;t believe the vSphere client will even let you enable FT if the two hosts aren&#039;t compatible will it?

Also what about running FT within a nested VMWare vSphere 4 cluster, a VM environment within a VM environment? I didn&#039;t actually realize until recently you could run nested VM environments at all.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>I appreciate the great information you provide on this blog, top notch stuff.</p>
<p>We implemented VMWare&#8217;s vSphere 4 a few months back and heard this limitation repeated by both VMWare&#8217;s folks and the reseller we had engaged to help us. I don&#8217;t believe the vSphere client will even let you enable FT if the two hosts aren&#8217;t compatible will it?</p>
<p>Also what about running FT within a nested VMWare vSphere 4 cluster, a VM environment within a VM environment? I didn&#8217;t actually realize until recently you could run nested VM environments at all.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiTRo</title>
		<link>http://vmguy.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>NiTRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://VMGUY.COM/wordpress/?p=1219#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Interesting, does the Check Compliance function highlight that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, does the Check Compliance function highlight that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

